Lee is having a personal crisis, I believe it is called
having a job and children, in other words the man is busy, busy, busy. Heck we
dragged Thomm’s post ahead a day so it would not be the blank page, because we
do not work very far ahead. Anyway Lee was going to just have a gone on
vacation or some other type of post, but I decided to see if I could opine
about something comics related. I can usually bore any non-comics fan in the span
of five minutes talking about comics, so I’m sure there is some subject I can
talk about.
The Golden Age of Comics is one. First let’s get this out of
the way; the early days of comic books were not the Golden Age of Comics. In my
mind the term would denote that something was at its absolute best. No matter
how you cut it those early days were about production, going with what ever
sold yesterday and seeing what sticks. It was more of an Iron Age of comics or
perhaps the Glory Days of comics. The Golden Age of Comics started about 10 or
15 years ago and is still ongoing. You can use the Watchmen as the first days
of the dawning of a Golden Age when comic books started to become literate and
the writers and artists use to medium to its best effect. Grant Morrison, Scott
Snyder, Ed Brubaker, Jason Aaron, Eric Powell, Robert Kirkman, Terry Moore, Joe
Hill, Jeff Parker, Bill Willingham, Jeff Lemire, Gary Frank, Ivan Reis, Marcos
Martin, Gabriel Rodriquez and the list of artists and writers goes on and on and
on. Today’s comics, in general, are the best comics have ever been. We are in
the Golden Age of comics and the same time the print comic is in its death
throes.
So back to what is called the Golden Age, it is a fun place
to read about and to check out all the old stories and we are blessed to have
so much of the material out there today. What got me into thinking about this
recently is a book called Amazing Mysteries, the Bill Everett Archives Volume
1. This book is one hell of a bargain. I have been upset with a lot of the
collections coming out of Marvel and DC as way too often they are not giving us
enough extras. I also have been less then thrilled with some other collections
of a single artist because often they miss balancing talking about the person
and talking about their work. This book seems to have a better balance then
most.

Bottom line for a good collection of a master in his early
days, this book is hard to beat.
No comments:
Post a Comment